Obama the dictator should be impeached

Clearly, IRS examiners investigated whether applicants should have been given tax exempt status to spend less than half their time and money making political ads. Some asked who were members of the group, which seems illegal, because if they did that, they'd see that the same names popped up in several of the other applications.

.

As the 'buck stops at the President, he should be impeached.

.

If a janitor (sanitary engineer) in a National Park rest room steals a box of toilet paper to take home, that is illegal. That act alone should make the President impeached, as he's ultimately responsible for all 288,000 federal employee actions.

.

As he's in complete dictatorial control of all the nation, they couldn't possibly misbehave without his knowing about it. Every department head is afraid his head will roll if there is misbehavior. So he is at the same time a President who has no control of all the personnel, and he's a complete dictator, depending upon the date of GOP media publications.

To leave a comment, please sign in with
or or

Comments (2)

  1. hotncold

    And how would that make matters better? Biden would be far worse, and nothing will change.

    May 16, 2013
  2. lawrencemills

    I have trouble with the impeachment of Obama over this mess just yet. First off, we have yet to have an investigation fully into what precisely went down and who knew what. I would say that Obama needs to get out in front of all this lest me have a very discomforting second term. Dictator??? I don’t get that. I have lived in Latin America (during the 1980’s) where there were certified dictators and this is NOT anywhere close to dictatorship. Anyone with any common sense will note that this system, as broke and dysfunctional as it is, has built-in safeguards that prevent a dictatorship. Simply put, a U.S. president does not have enough power to do any of the things the FOX bubble asserts he is actually doing. Once again, the GOP/Right wing nut jobs are chomping at the bit in order to convince people outside of their low-information base that Obama is responsible for the decline of the United States. I find it interesting that those who for cry about the 4 people killed in Benghazi are ignoring the American lives still being taken in the war in Afghanistan, not to mention the thousands killed on 9/11, where there was for all intents and purposes a shoddy investigation there. Double standards abound. Hypocrits the lot of them! I am tired of not calling a spade a spade and so here it is: most of this criticism is due to his blackness, period. Most of his critics have this deeply ingrained mental chip and fear that this black dude is going to take them over, control what they see as their exclusive hold on things, and end life as they knew it. All of that is preposterous but sadly it is how these folks think and act on a daily basis. If the GOP would spend a tenth of the time and energy they have wasted the past 4 plus years on repeal votes on Obamacare (38 and counting), Benghazi investigations that have not revealed anything substaintial we have not already known, and just being downright obstructionist white-robe wearing assholes, we probably could have by now come up with some effective policies that could actually improve life for Americans that arre hurting.

    May 16, 2013
    1. proto-gnostic

      I’ll second that!

      May 16, 2013
    2. livelonger

      So long as Obama is President, the prejudiced concept that people of certain kinds are inferior in accomplishment and intellect is proved false. There is nothing that anyone can do to show they’re superior in any way. That in itself is enough to hate by people that want to be better by faking being closer to God, or simply have an ‘approved’ complexion without any other serious accomplishment. The insane will spend inordinate time to camouflage their status.

      May 16, 2013
      1. lawrencemills

        What are you talking about? With all due respect, I am curious to hear you explain yourself. For a second it sounds as if you are saying that because there is a black president there no longer is a reality to accusations of bigotry or racism. If I am correct in reading you, I must wholeheartedly disagree. Intellects such as Tim Wise and Cornell West have called what we are experiencing Racism 2.0, and I would suggest reading some of Wise’s papers online that give a far better explanation of what that looks like than I can.

        July 25, 2014
        1. livelonger

          So long as Obama is President, the prejudiced concept that people of certain kinds are inferior in accomplishment and intellect is proved false.
          Try to get Cornell West to explain that.

          July 25, 2014
  3. This comment has been deleted
  4. This comment has been deleted
  5. This comment has been deleted
  6. hotncold

    Funny how low information voters on this post can think that the fault lies with Fox/GOP/Right wingers. Shows where the previous post-reply lacks real information, no wonder we have the problems we have. Nowhere on the post thread is it stated that Obama is a Dictator or wants to be one

    Simply the post is showing that Obama can no longer pretend he has nothing to do with what is going on and, that he was out of the office playing golf as usual, it also shows that Obama administration is NOT transparent as he said they would be.

    When you refuse to follow the facts or the truth, you admit to being an extremely “LOW-INFORMATION” voter.
    If you low-information voters want real changes, let those with the real information and facts vote for you.

    May 16, 2013
  7. livelonger

    Yes. the Bush-appointed acting head of the IRS really should have insisted on telling Obama what was going on in his department. He should have made a rule that each application by a conservative non-profit had to be matched by a liberal non-profit to be fair and equal. Of course, no profiling to find out which was which was allowable – that’s the big complaint here – that conservative groups were identified before examining them.

    May 16, 2013
    1. hotncold

      I agree!

      May 16, 2013
  8. GovMisdirection

    Impeach?!? Clinton was impeached on two counts, Congress flushed that turd and he floated back to the top. Obama will require impeachment and criminal charges.

    May 16, 2013
    1. livelonger

      That’s right. Obama has been lax in his duties, He should call every department head everyday to make sure they tell him everything that’s going on truthfully just as every President has done since Washington (George had a cell phone to keep in touch.)

      May 16, 2013
    2. livelonger

      Until someone is actually removed from office, the high-sounding word ‘impeach’ is used to impress people with a whining accusation.
      “im·peachment n.
      Usage Note: When an irate citizen demands that a disfavored public official be impeached, the citizen clearly intends for the official to be removed from office. This popular use of impeach as a synonym of “throw out” (even if by due process) does not accord with the legal meaning of the word. As recent history has shown, when a public official is impeached, that is, formally accused of wrongdoing, this is only the start of what can be a lengthy process that may or may not lead to the official’s removal from office. In strict usage, an official is impeached (accused), tried, and then convicted or acquitted. The vaguer use of impeach reflects disgruntled citizens’ indifference to whether the official is forced from office by legal means or chooses to resign to avoid further disgrace."
      http://www.thefreedictionary.com/impeach

      May 16, 2013
      1. livelonger

        I disagree, his name is indication that he intends to misdirect, which is the same as using false information to get a slanted view across to many.

        May 16, 2013