Obama: 'NBC of Presidents' for Shrinking Fan Base

'Daily Show' Mocks Obama: 'NBC of Presidents' for Shrinking Fan Base

.

The Daily Show isn't letting up on President Barack Obama despite host Jon Stewart's summer vacation.

This week, fill-in anchor John Oliver torched Obama's visit to Germany, daring to compare the president to a flailing, failing broadcast network.

Oliver noted the dramatic drop in crowd size from the president's 2008 address in Germany to his June 19 speech. Even the liberal comedy show couldn't hide this decline.

“Losing 95 percent of your audience in just five years, that basically makes Obama the NBC of presidents."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

.

I think the new president smell went away after the first month.  This empty suit of a president is merely a joke to all the night time comedians.  The following are some of the reasons people our losing interest in Obama.

.

1. When you don't have substance people lose interest and don't come back. They all got cought up in the moment. 

2. When you make false promises people lose interest.

3. When you lie and cover up 4 American deaths people lose interest.

4. When your administration has the same hit list as the IRS then people lose interest.

5. When you're known as the 'Food stamp president'... people lose interest.

6. When you insist that the Catholic Church should be forced to do things against their faith... people lose interest.

7. When you decide to go after the media and free speech, people lose interest.

.

People are starting to get it. The man doesn't know what he's doing. Lecturer, community organizer, 143 days experience in the Senate, President. Not a lot on that resume.  But now the rock star seems to be losing his mojo at the precise time when Democrats most need Obama to rise to the occasion and help save their House and Senate majorities. The stakes could not be higher, because losing control of Congress could cripple Obama's agenda in the final two years of his second term.

.

We can all hope... for some serious change.

 

To leave a comment, please sign in with
or or

Comments (1)

  1. knights68

    Nice list there, but quiet honestly I think from the leftists perspective I think they think once Obama didn’t go left enough to what they had hoped/planned, and those “pesky” republicans blocking heir leader in getting those leftists things done, they started to lose interest. We all know that many on the left have the attention span of a goldfish and how easily distracted they are. They had Hillary until Obama showed up and then they flaked on her for Obama. this is not the only example, just the latest in a long long line of examples where the Libs, the leftists and such who tout to be the king makers, they lose interest and move on to the next flavor of the day, so to speak. Afterall, they did their job in getting a leftist dem elected, for TWO terms no less. Now they can start looking around for someone else to put in there. Who’ll give odds that they’ll throw dear leader under the bus, much lesser degree than they did the Clintons, but thrown nonetheless?

    June 21, 2013
    1. jillsthoughts

      I can agree with your statement of “flavor of the day” and the democrats, but don’t you think it works the same with republicans? re: Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, and Michele Bachmann? Let’s face it, party politics are based on polls, and the entire party stands behind the person whose polls are highest on any given day.

      June 21, 2013
    2. Brn2bfree

      Great post …
      You’re so right about the low information crowd … ‘have the attention span of a goldfish’. They forget easily and could care less. At first I thought they were ignorant (not knowing) niaeve, (kinda brainwashed) But I’m thinking they are in so much need of the government that they don’t want to bite the hand that feeds them. For example.
      1. The blacks and the Mexicans are very religious people… even though they don’t believe in abortion….but they turn their heads against partial birth abortion that the Democrats promote.
      2. Not to mention they turn their backs on Obama for forcing the Catholics …
      .
      Btw, dumping Hillary and taking on Obama was a great move… I wonder if they knew that they would get 95% of the black vote… 80% of the Muslim vote… 80% of the Hispanic and Asian vote….and 80% of the single women vote.?? The common denominator… they all want government assistance. Every body has a hungry heart.
      .
      ……. like Sarah Palin would say to that question….. ‘…you betcha’

      June 21, 2013
      1. Neighsayer

        " . . . 95% of the black vote… 80% of the Muslim vote… 80% of the Hispanic and Asian vote….and 80% of the single women vote." – all those people are voters and Americans. But they don’t “count” for you, do they?

        June 21, 2013
        1. Brn2bfree

          WTF are you talking about … all those voters don’t matter to me? I’m showing the facts as to what percentage of people voted for the Democrats. The common denominator of those people is that they want government assistance.
          .
          Why are you having a problem understanding that. I like the way try to spin it.

          June 21, 2013
          1. Neighsayer

            speak English! What are you trying to say?

            June 21, 2013
            1. Brn2bfree

              Learn to understand English then you’ll know what I"m saying.
              Here, I’ll type slow for you.
              /

              Did you know that 95% of the blacks voted for Obama..?
              .
              Did you understand this sentence?

              June 22, 2013
            2. livelonger

              Does theat tell you something about the GOP’s platform attractiveness to anyome other than white old men?

              June 22, 2013
            3. jillsthoughts

              Exactly, Livelonger.

              June 22, 2013
            4. mrmacq

              “Did you know that 95% of the blacks voted for Obama..?”
              .
              and as we all know blacks arent “real americans”
              just ask herr brn there
              .
              good golly miss molly
              .
              anyhoo
              urban dictionary on…

              “real american”
              .
              Someone that is over wieght, drinks cheap beer, watches football, has a dirty, old, American flag hanging outside thier house/trailer, doesn’t give a shit about the less fortunate, owns more than five guns, complains about stupid, little things, and shoots black people on the weekends.
              .
              Git out, you niggers an’ spics! This is ma country, I’ma real American! YEEEEHAAAWWW!! all awhile shooting shotgun at the sky
              .
              yup herr brn
              you is
              a real american…congrats

              June 22, 2013
            5. Neighsayer

              " . . . Did you know that 95% of the blacks voted for Obama..?
              .
              Did you understand this sentence?"

              Yup. Do you? If not, read Mac’s comment several times, and then get your kids to ’splain it to you.

              " . . . Did you know that 95% of the blacks voted for Obama..? "

              Fair’s fair, Buddy. It’s not who, it’s how many.

              June 22, 2013
            6. Brn2bfree

              Coming from a person with a French accent.

              September 17, 2015
        2. Neighsayer

          No. “Stupid” would be forgiveable. These conservative trolls are evil.

          June 21, 2013
  2. livelonger

    Wow! All this self-flattery by people who didn’t finish college, who want to convince the world that they’re smarter than college professors, all based on the size of a crowd in GERMANY that somehow indicates voters in the US.

    June 21, 2013
  3. jillsthoughts

    I love the Daily Show for NOT being the democratic party followers, like Rush, Beck, and Hannity are to the republicans. Yes, they are more liberal, and that’s my favorite part. And if you think the Daily Show is good, you should stay up a little later and watch Stephen Colbert! He reminds me a lot of you, by the way, Brn.

    June 21, 2013
    1. livelonger

      Stewart and Colbert seek and stretch for comedy, not to destroy the US, Brn is sadly comedic, thinking his commentary is serious.

      June 21, 2013
    2. Brn2bfree

      Nice try… Colbert is a fraud. He is a wolf in sheeps clothes per say. He comes on like a conservative … in a way mocking.
      Btw, in politics, I believe you are either liberal or conservative. If you’re genuine, then you would hold true to those values and get your information from those venues. You liberals think you can stradle both sides. You end up, looking like a fool with your pants on the floor.

      June 21, 2013
      1. Neighsayer

        “In a way!” Boy, I knew it. American conservatives don’r get jokes.

        June 21, 2013
        1. jillsthoughts

          You beat me to this! I can’t believe Brn just figured this out! My laugh for the day.

          June 21, 2013
          1. Neighsayer

            also – “per say.” Wow.

            June 21, 2013
        2. Brn2bfree

          I got it… Obama is a joke … and Canadian bacons like you don’t get it. They just worship Obama from a distance. When the Obama reads his teleprompter, Canadians blow a wet spot.

          June 22, 2013
          1. Neighsayer

            No Canuck worships any ‘Murriken, don’t worry. We’re just kinda glad you didn’t elect Rmoney, so we didn’t have to go 1812 on your ass again.

            June 22, 2013
            1. Brn2bfree

              ‘we didn’t have to go 1812 on your ass again.’
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~
              ???? You Canucks … do you guys have an army? Try putting together an army with the people who run to Canada to avoid service here

              June 22, 2013
      2. livelonger

        At lest Brn isn’t a fraud; he actually believes what Breibart says, as that’s the only information he knows.

        June 21, 2013
        1. Brn2bfree

          I do believe what Breitbarts says… like you believe Huffies post or any left wing rag… The difference between us is that you are constantly bashing my sources and giving back no substance in a reply.

          June 22, 2013
        2. Neighsayer

          Yeah, Livelonger, you never have any substance! You could learn something from Barney here. And Baby Bop too. (Imagination . . . )

          June 22, 2013
      3. livelonger

        “If you’re genuine, then you would hold true to those values and get your information from those venues.”
        That’s your main problem; you can only examine the 20% of suggestions provided by wing-nuts, so miss all the good ideas.

        June 21, 2013
      4. jillsthoughts

        Republicans think things are black and white. Conservatives and liberals know better. After all, some of the republican party would say Ron Paul is a liberal on some issues, like war…

        June 21, 2013
        1. Brn2bfree

          3. When you lie and cover up 4 American deaths people lose interest.
          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          You have a problem answering this one eh Ms. Jilski

          June 21, 2013
          1. livelonger

            Still spewing lies about covering up the people who died in the news the next day.

            June 22, 2013
            1. jillsthoughts

              That was exactly my response to Brn. He’s still trying to talk himself into believing there was a cover-up by this administration.

              June 22, 2013
        2. Brn2bfree

          You still can’t answer my question… here, let’s go over it again.
          After the Benghazi attacks… we all knew that it was a terrorist attack, right? Even though it was hard for Obama to say it was a terrorist attack. He did say it …right?
          .
          you and I know that it was a terrorist attack …. Richtig? Comrade Jill?
          .
          Ok my question to you is….. WHY DID OBAMA, RICE AND HILLARY KEEP SAYING IT WAS A VIDEO?
          …. NOW THAT’S YOUR COVER UP!!!!!

          June 22, 2013
          1. jillsthoughts

            Are you YELLING at me, Brn? All of that has been explained over and over again. The day after the event, Obama called it an act of terrorism.
            .
            From Obama’s speech the morning following the attack at Benghazii:
            “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”

            June 22, 2013
            1. Brn2bfree

              I guess it seemed like I was yelling. I’m frustrated.
              Ok, let’s take baby steps with you. We both agree to the first part…
              .
              Now for the second part…..
              Ok.. I agree with your statement above… we all knew it was a terorrist attack. You are still avoiding my question.
              If it was a terrorist act.. then why did Obama and Rice and Hillbilly keep blaming it on the video.?? It was two weeks after the incident. He went in front of the world via the UN saying it was the video…. and spent 75K on commericials in Afghanistan promoting that lie.

              Why did he blame it on the video after knowing it was a terrorist act..?
              .
              Why did he blame it on the video after knowing it was a terrorist act..?
              .
              Why did he blame it on the video after knowing it was a terrorist act..?
              .
              Remember the 100 or so emails that surfaced from the WH about the Benghazi thing didn’t mention about any video.

              June 22, 2013
            2. jillsthoughts

              I have no idea why they said it was reaction to a video. I have no idea if there was a reason for them to say that, or if the CIA was not fully informing them. I do know that the CIA gave them their talking points. I do know that Congress has not yet, in the last, what, nine months, found any smoking gun. I do know that the Obama administration has made 27 (or so) changes to protecting our embassies since it occurred. I do know that there was nothing that could have been done to protect these four lives. I do know that more embassy officials died under Bush than Obama, and yet he wasn’t under such scrutiny nor did he improve embassy security.
              .
              That’s what I know and don’t know. I can’t imagine you know anything more than that, unless you work for the CIA.

              June 22, 2013
            3. mrmacq

              “75K on commericials in Afghanistan promoting that lie.”
              .
              oh my fucking gawd
              .
              so let me get this straight
              (i’m really not trying to laugh here)
              first we must get something perfectly clear
              there is a difference between teletubbies and taliban
              i trust you understand?
              .
              anyways
              its your turn to do the walking
              please provide the links to your claim

              “specifically”
              75 thousand in afganistan on ads saying bengazi was due to a film

              June 22, 2013
            4. Neighsayer

              was it not an attack – I don’t care for the magic power of the word “terrorist” – made during an anti-America protest, hence the initial confusion?

              June 22, 2013
            5. Brn2bfree

              jillsthoughts

              I have no idea why they said it was reaction to a video.
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~
              Thank you… finally
              This statement tells me more about you. Either you’re not a sincere person or you’re just another low information Obama lover. … which one is it?
              .
              It’s so obvious that Obama did this because it would hurt his re-election. You don’t see this…. realy? Are you kidding me? He had killed Osama and that put an end to terrorism… He didn’t want to change that montra.
              .
              Your denial of this makes you incahoots with his lame attempt to cover up. These people in Benghazi called 9/11 and the Obama turned his back on them… for the sake of his re-election.
              .
              This is the way I C it.

              June 22, 2013
            6. jillsthoughts

              “This is the way I C it.”
              .
              And once again, you demonstrate how wrong you are.
              .
              When I say I have no idea why they said that, it is because
              1. I was not there.
              2. I don’t have access to CIA discussion with or without Obama.
              3. Neither do you.
              .
              I can only base what I know on facts, as opposed to you basing what you say on false stories that we keep proving are lies.
              .
              I haven’t denied anything, but you continually deny the truth. And that is why Congress has yet to pin anything on Obama after all these months.

              June 22, 2013
            7. Brn2bfree

              I thought we were getting somewhere… but you just farted. … your brain just farted … One step forward two steps back.
              ‘I was not there’…. Realy?

              June 22, 2013
  4. keepingitreal_13

    And yet when he got elected it wasn’t even close. Just wondering if all those people that voted for him the second time around are that stupid that they didn’t see all his shortcomings in his first four years ? Guess they were that stupid or didn’t give a shit in the first four so they voted for him for a second four. Good thing he can’t serve a third term cause i think they stupid one’s would vote him in a third time around.

    June 21, 2013
    1. Brn2bfree

      You are keeping it real… Not only the Republicans can’t compete with Santa Claus, but we are finding out that the game was rigged. Obama had the same hit list as the IRS….

      June 21, 2013
      1. Brn2bfree

        The head of IRS went to the WH over a 150 times.. hmmm…doesn’t that smell fishy?

        June 22, 2013
        1. deaconjim

          But you still haven’t told us HOW the IRS can rig an election. They sure didn’t twist MY arm. How many do you know whose homes were visited by the IRS and the occupants were told to vote Democrat?

          June 22, 2013
          1. Brn2bfree

            Mr. Jim,
            The IRS indirectly effected the elections by denying hundreds of conservative groups from getting non tax status to get funding.

            June 22, 2013
            1. jillsthoughts

              Wait a minute, Brn. This all took place in one office in Cincinnati. Will you please direct me to a credible link that says hundreds of conservative groups were affected by this? And then can you please explain to me how these people’s votes were changed because of their tax status. Seems to me, their minds were made up, and they were already out there misleading Ohioans. Do you remember that post I offered way back when this first started? The one about these groups not even being REQUIRED to seek that status on the federal level.
              .
              Much ado about nothing.

              June 22, 2013
            2. deaconjim

              If I understand you correctly, you’re saying these groups couldn’t raise tax-exempt money that could be used to air more ads against President Obama. Or maybe they could’ve aired some ads that might make us think Romney cared about the 47% of Americans he had already flushed down the toilet. I hate to break it to you, but Romney being Romney is what lost the election. Unless the IRS forced Romney to be Romney, your claim of election rigging has no merit.

              June 22, 2013
          2. Brn2bfree

            Many conservative groups are sueing the IRS. I think that the Tea Party is seen as old white people…. therefore I feel that this is now a civil rights issue. They singled out a certain race of people.
            .
            Regardless of what could have happened if the conservatives had more money… but let’s talk about what did happen. The IRS admitted… people like you and Ms. Jill are defending them to no end. It’s sickening that you don’t see this because it happened to the side you dislike. I hope that some day.. the IRS comes after you. Then maybe you may know how it feels.

            June 22, 2013
            1. jillsthoughts

              Yes, the IRS in CINCINNATI admitted to targeting some Tea Party and/or Patriot groups. But without a memo on how to target them, or any clarification, for that matter. So again, tell us exactly HOW MANY groups were targeted and how this changed the election.

              June 22, 2013
            2. deaconjim

              :Many conservative groups are sueing the IRS." – Brn, what does that prove? They’ll go to court and either win or lose. Do you think someone will present proof in court the election changed because of the IRS?
              -
              “I think that the Tea Party is seen as old white people…. therefore I feel that this is now a civil rights issue. They singled out a certain race of people.” – Brn, I’m happy to see you have a sense of humor.
              -
              As I said a long time ago, it’s only speculation on your part that the IRS’ actions changed the outcome of the election. You can’t prove it. I’m pretty sure if the IRS had approved those applications as soon as they came in, President Obama still would have won. I can’t prove it. If you can find several million people from blue states that would swear they would have voted Republican if there were more ads supporting Romney, you might have a persuasive argument. Otherwise, STFU. If you want to piss and moan about the IRS going after your precious Tea Party hacks, go right ahead, but lay the election rigging accusation until you have some concrete proof.

              June 22, 2013
        2. Neighsayer

          Yeah, he works there.

          June 22, 2013
          1. Brn2bfree

            Who works where?
            Shulman? Lol…

            June 22, 2013
            1. Neighsayer

              isn’t that right? – well this is: what secret conspiracy has 150 meetings in such a public place? Again, brilliant theory.

              June 22, 2013
    2. Neighsayer

      that’s the essence of bigotry. “Those stupid people” voting for someone who’s useless or worse – that’s bigotry. You think they are so stupid they say to themselves ’I’m gonna vote for the worse option?!?!?’ That is not forwarding any sort of useful debate if you can’t try to see why we think he was the better option. Face it, conservatives hate the Dems for feeding the poor, and they think it’s more important to feed the rich.

      June 21, 2013
      1. Brn2bfree

        When a Dem politician sees the poor on the street… he says let’s feed this guy, he’s hurtin for certain… The liberal meat head voter would say… ahhh.. how nice, he cares. I think I’ll vote for him… 30 years nothing changes.
        .
        When a conservative sees the poor on the street…… he says, let’s see how we can give him the skills, tools to be self sufficient.
        .
        To the liberals, it’s all about feelings … they want people to see that they care… how nice.. But at the end of the day.. nothing gets done. But they feel good.

        June 21, 2013
        1. livelonger

          When a conservative sees the poor on the street…… he says, let’s see how we can give him the skills, tools to be self sufficient. If he doesn’t get food before he actually gets those jobs, well then – tough – die.

          June 22, 2013
        2. deaconjim

          I don’t know how the conservatives expect to give him the skills and the tools so he can be self-sufficient when they want to cut funding for the programs designed to teach him those skills and provide those tools they claim they want to give him.

          June 22, 2013
          1. Brn2bfree

            You guys are like cross town traffic.. it’s so hard to get through to you all.
            Well deac…. we know that liberals and their methods have been in play for the last 30-40 years.. all you get is more poverty.

            June 22, 2013
            1. mrmacq

              " liberals and their methods have been in play for the last 30-40 years."
              .
              and yet more bullshit
              what?
              your repulsives were so inept they couldnt counter during?
              or were the libs in power that long?

              June 22, 2013
        3. Neighsayer

          conservatives say “Let’s loan him some money for food and rent, and then sell his debt to the last few members of the middle class!”

          June 22, 2013
          1. Brn2bfree

            The bleading heart liberal ellitists believe in government charity as a means of power over those poor people. They need an underclass of people as their base. They can’t have things getting better… they’ll be out of a job.

            June 22, 2013
            1. mrmacq

              so many brain cells fried eh herr brn?

              June 22, 2013
  5. trueman

    hope we can bee leave in – change you can hope for – yes we can

    June 21, 2013
    1. Brn2bfree

      You’re still stuck on ‘yes we can’? That was soo yesterday.

      June 22, 2013
  6. philagain

    i think Obama is a modern day Kennedy i can remember as a child my mum telling me about how she was in a cinema here in the UK and when Kennedy was assassinated they interrupted the film for me i think that Obama has been the greatest president since i’ve been around and i’m in my early 40’s!

    June 22, 2013
    1. Brn2bfree

      I think you are wrong. He’s going to be one of the worse presidents in history..
      None of you liberals understand how severe this Benghazi thing is. The president deliberately lied and tried to cover up 4 American deaths. How can a liar be the greatest president ever?

      June 22, 2013
      1. livelonger

        Let’s see … he had about 12 hours before the news started printing the news of their death. The ‘coverup’ if any didn’t work at all.

        June 22, 2013
      2. Neighsayer

        Show me one other American president that only has four embarrassing deaths to account for and we’ll talk. Good Lord!

        June 22, 2013
        1. Brn2bfree

          Show me another situation like this in American history where a president knowing damn well that the attack at Benghazi was a terrorist attack but kept blaming it on the video because he knew it would damage his re-election.
          If you can’t see that… you’re out there in the tundra rolling in some moose turds

          June 22, 2013
          1. Neighsayer

            Brilliant! Let’s say it was a movie protest and hope no-one notices the giant holes blown out of the compound, to help get re-elected! That’s just as smart as everything else he does, huh? Nice theory.

            June 22, 2013
            1. mrmacq

              ya just might want to dumb that down for him
              herr brn aint to good at ….cognitive thought.
              oh wait

              This concept is the guiding principle behind cognitive therapy, a type of psychotherapy developed by psychiatrist Aaron T. Beck in the 1960s. If we think something often enough, we begin to believe it’s true and our feelings match what we are thinking

              June 22, 2013
            2. mrmacq

              in other words
              the dudes broken
              thank crap
              theres those “liberal” programs to help him
              (but first he must seek attention)

              June 22, 2013
            3. Neighsayer

              LOL

              June 22, 2013
      3. mrmacq

        i promise i wont vote for him either
        .
        oh wait..
        im a canuck
        no matter
        if it makes herr brn feel better

        June 22, 2013
        1. deaconjim

          But they keep complaining about voter fraud. Maybe you really can vote here.

          June 22, 2013
          1. mrmacq

            oh my gawd
            invaders from on up north
            wait one…
            what if we really aint interested in the bullshit down there?
            what if we enjoy the actual freedoms we have up here?
            .
            do we really have to throw all that away?
            .
            (you cant make me so screw you HAH!)

            June 22, 2013
        2. Brn2bfree

          I know you can’t vote for him… but you wish you could. You join hands with liberals here in the states and singing ‘kumbaya’… via the internet.

          June 22, 2013
          1. mrmacq

            actually brn
            the song we sing is
            “abort al the retards as they are not helping humanity”

            June 22, 2013
  7. philagain

    He’s a better president than Clinton was and he’s the last decent one that you had…I hope that we will see Hillary as president next!

    June 22, 2013
    1. deaconjim

      Bill Clinton was the best President in my lifetime (58 years). Obama could have been great, but he’s been saddled with a Congress whose entire agenda is to see him fail, even if the country suffers. I too hope to see President Clinton, Part II. Hillary could be as good as or better than Bill was.

      June 22, 2013
      1. mrmacq

        go hillary!!!

        June 22, 2013
        1. philagain

          Her next please!

          June 22, 2013
        2. Brn2bfree

          4 Americans died ‘What difference does it make?’
          Ask the families of the dead you fucking BITCH!!

          June 22, 2013
          1. mrmacq

            why in hells name
            did you attach that reply to my post?
            oh wait
            now its hillarys fault?
            but you just finished saying it was obamas
            .
            youre a very confusing lad dude

            June 22, 2013
            1. Brn2bfree

              Obama is hiding behind skirts… Rice and Hillbilly
              He’s pimping those gals for his benefits… … lad
              You’re a real Corker…comrade.

              June 22, 2013
            2. Brn2bfree

              Mr. Mac… I wasn’t calling you a ‘fucking Bitch’… That was for Hillbilly.. I was trying to answer your reply ‘go hillary!!!’ Took the opportunity to let you know what I think of her.

              June 22, 2013
          2. deaconjim

            Why are you more worried about the terrorists’ motive than you are about 4 dead Americans?

            June 22, 2013
            1. Brn2bfree

              Mr. Jim, WTF are you talking about? You’re not making any sense.
              .
              I’m more worried about the following…
              .
              1. Obama lied when four Americans died…
              2. Obama turned his back on those who called 9/11. (we don’t leave our soldiers behind)
              3. Obama tried to cover it up by sending his bitches out to lie for him.
              4. I’m also worried about so many low information Obama lovers who turn a blind eye to what is so obvious.
              ….. but hey… Don’t get steamed over RICE… Just listen to what Hillbilly said… ‘WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE.?’
              .
              ’We’re all going to hell in a handbasket and there’s a shortage of handbaskets’

              June 22, 2013
            2. deaconjim

              Brn, you just made my point. You are more concerned over hanging the President and Secretary Clinton, than you are about finding out who did it.

              June 22, 2013
          3. mrmacq

            id like to give you a thumbs up for that post

            June 22, 2013
          4. deaconjim

            Amen to that.

            June 22, 2013
          5. Brn2bfree

            Ms. Js, I like your spin on ‘What difference does it make?’
            Why don’t you ask the families of those killed? Let’s see if they buy your shit.
            You liberals are good at the blame game. I’m surprised you and your cheerleaders (Mac and Jim) aren’t blaming this on Bush.

            June 22, 2013
          6. mrmacq

            you purposely misread everything
            its got to be that
            cuse nobody’s that stupid
            anyhoo
            heres the video herr brn
            http://video.foxnews.com/v/2114197287001/clinton-what-difference-at-this-point-does-it-make/
            .
            please note “…at this point…”

            June 22, 2013
        3. mrmacq

          my puppies would win the battle of wits
          if pitted against
          .
          and you are right
          as an outsider i see those hillbillies
          and thank the gawd “CRAP
          they are your idgits

          June 22, 2013
        4. Brn2bfree

          Hold on … I don’t treat my best friend like that… man, you’re evil.. beating your dog like that. What’s the matter with you?

          June 22, 2013
      2. philagain

        That isn’t good though and tbf i will still say that he hasn’t been as good as Obama but i’m talking from an English point of view and i don’t live in your country so i’m not aware of all of the facts.

        June 22, 2013
        1. Brn2bfree

          A guy who was accused of rape… an adulterest , womenizer who lied under oath is your American idol eh… what a schmuck

          June 22, 2013
  8. philagain

    Are you talking about Bush senior and the other fucking muppet!…Silly older Bush got fucked over because he didn’t go all the way to Iraq the first time so Saddam put out lots of contracts on his life.

    Stupid dick George Bush (the one with even less intelligence) did go all the way in the second Iraq was and dragged Tony Blair into it and a bloody good PM but got sullied with you neo con basterwards!

    June 22, 2013
  9. philagain

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yovzZkf6OFQ

    LOL

    June 22, 2013
  10. Brn2bfree

    I hope you have a great day also… thank you.

    June 22, 2013